The 2-Minute Rule for religious based asylum case laws usa
The 2-Minute Rule for religious based asylum case laws usa
Blog Article
case law Case regulation is regulation that is based on judicial decisions alternatively than regulation based on constitutions , statutes , or regulations . Case regulation concerns exceptional disputes resolved by courts using the concrete facts of the case. By contrast, statutes and regulations are written abstractly. Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common regulation , refers back to the collection of precedents and authority established by previous judicial decisions over a particular issue or matter.
How much sway case regulation holds may perhaps change by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances of your current case. To investigate this concept, take into account the following case legislation definition.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the realized counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of your subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this factor for interim custody of the subject premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
Also, it might review an appeal of the decision for which it's got granted certification. In addition to its legal authority, the Court holds limited political authority. It will review and finalize a decision by the New Jersey Redistricting Commission on redistricting congressional districts If your Commission cannot reach a decision.
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. In addition they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi units, with non-compliance struggling with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, These are directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based around the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted inside of a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically bring about exoneration from departmental charges based on the same factual grounds. Though a writ under Article 199 is out there in specific limited situations, it can be generally not the suitable remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full opportunity to cross-study witnesses and present his/her defense but did not persuade the department of his/her innocence.
We've been an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of legislation and to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed with the Constitution and laws in the United States and this State.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be properly-settled that even though contemplating the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority needs to look at the benefit of all of the suitable candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to these kinds of eligible candidates who will be found to get most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held to generally be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked from the respondent department just to increase favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy around the part of the respondent department.
The law of necessity regarded and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it was the illegal action called legislation of necessity..
Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of while in the terms stated over. However no harassment shall be caused to both party as well as the case shall be decided with the competent court of regulation if pending. Read more
The appellate court determined that the here trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to generally be gathered with the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
seventeen . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have read the uncovered counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession with the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this aspect for interim custody of the subject premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
The realized Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced with the findings during the Impugned order, after recording of evidence from the respective parties. Read more